There is a lot I could say about the choices made by Amanda Bynes’ hair and makeup people before the US Hairspray premiere last night.
A lot.
I could make references to the fact as she’s not about to pose in crotchless panties in People magazine there is no need for that kind of tacky, porno, sparkly eye/sparkly lip, trashy, far-too-much-liner-in-use painted doll look.
I could also possibly suggest that skin as young and plump as hers doesn’t need one tenth of the amount of makeup she’s got on, expecially not in those proportions (read: lots, everywhere.)
I may hint that while her tan is probably real, and therefore accurate shade-wise, it may make her look cheap when she complements it with cleavage, cascading extensions and That Makeup.
And finally, I could imply that her hair, which has been bleached and extended and tonged and flicked to within a Pamela-Anderson of its life, may benefit from being less blonde, and shorter and more, well, how she used to have it when she was cute and funny and clever on her own TV show.
But I don’t need to say aaaany of that.
They know what they’re doing, right?
Responses to this drivel ( 37 )